Connect with us

Cosmopolitan

Facebook Unprepared to Deal With Jan. 6 Insurrection: Leaked Documents

Published

on

CmaTrends

Facebook executives routinely dismissed or downplayed employee concerns about the spread of misinformation on its platform, both before and after the 2020 presidential election, according to a wave of coordinated articles published Friday citing newly leaked internal documents.

The dismissive attitude among the company’s higher-ups left Facebook unprepared to deal with the events of Jan. 6, when a pro-Trump mob descended on the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to overturn the election, the articles allege.

Some of the reports Friday said the documents were provided by Frances Haugen, an ex-product manager at Facebook, who leaked information to the Wall Street Journal, filed complaints with the SEC and testified before Congress. But other outlets, including the Washington Post, said their reports were based on an affidavit filed with the SEC from a second whistleblower, who is another ex-Facebook employee formerly on the company’s integrity team who wished to remain anonymous.

According to the Washington Post, the new SEC affidavit alleges that Facebook officials routinely undermined efforts to fight misinformation, hate speech and other problematic content “out of fear of angering then-President Donald Trump and his political allies, or out of concern about potentially dampening the user growth key to Facebook’s multibillion-dollar profits.”

CNN cited an internal Facebook analysis of the Jan. 6 insurrection that found that the policies and procedures put in place by the company were not enough to prevent the growth of groups related to “Stop the Steal.”

Per the New York Times, of the dozens of steps that Facebook employees recommended, some — such as allowing company engineers to mass-delete posts that were being reported for pushing violence — were implemented. But other measures, such as preventing groups from changing their names to terms such as Stop the Steal, were not fully implemented because of last-minute technology glitches, according to the spreadsheet. to a spreadsheet. There, they began cataloging the measures that the company was taking against election misinformation and inflammatory content on its platform

Bloomberg reported on documents that showed employees at Facebook expressed shock and outrage after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. The remarks, directed at Chief Technology Officer Mike Schroepfer, were included in a package of disclosures provided to Congress in redacted form by lawyers representing Haugen. The documents, obtained by a consortium of news organizations including Bloomberg, provide a unique window into a Facebook few outsiders ever see: a stunningly profitable technology firm showing signs of sagging morale and internal strife. “I’m struggling to match my value to my employment here,” one employee wrote, according to the Bloomberg story. “I came here hoping to affect change and improve society, but all I’ve seen is atrophy and abdication of responsibility.”

In a Jan. 11 interview at the Reuters Next conference, Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg acknowledged that “our enforcement is never perfect, so I’m sure there were still things on Facebook,” after the company removed groups associated with QAnon, the Proud Boys and Stop the Steal. But, she said, “I think these events were largely organized on platforms that don’t have our abilities to stop hate, don’t have our standards and don’t have our transparency.”

In the New York Times report, citing the leaked documents, a Facebook data scientist wrote to colleagues that 10% of all U.S. views of political content on the site were of posts alleging that the 2020 U.S. presidential was fraudulent.

In a 1,200-word blog post Friday evening, Facebook VP of integrity Guy Rosen defended the company’s actions with respect to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. He said Facebook put numerous protocols in place ahead of and after the 2020 election.

According to Rosen, that included putting a series of “temporary product measures in place where there were specific risks that spikes in activity on the platform could mean that the many systems we had in place to enforce our policies may not be able to keep up.” He said Facebook “took these steps to respond to specific signals we were seeing on the platform, such as spikes in reported content — and turned some of them off responsibly and gradually as those signals returned to their previous levels.”

“To blame what happened on January 6 on how we implemented just one [measure] is absurd,” Rosen wrote. “We are a significant social media platform so it’s only natural for content about major events like that to show up on Facebook. But responsibility for the insurrection itself falls squarely on the insurrectionists who broke the law and those who incited them.”

Rosen added that Facebook worked with law enforcement “in the days and weeks after January 6 with the goal of ensuring that information linking the people responsible for it to their crimes is available.”

Tobi is a reserved individual, loves making friends and a top-notch web developer. Currently, he's working as a freelancer for cmatrends.com

Click to comment

Leave a Comment on CmaTrends

TRANSLATOR

Advertisement

Skip to toolbar